### "Despite Its Challenges..."
Что думаешь? Оцени!，推荐阅读WhatsApp Web 網頁版登入获取更多信息
The Palsgraf perspective’s organizing interpretive commitment is that relational duties and wrongs — rather than impersonal duties and wrongs, or incentives for promoting societal interests or impersonal values — lie at the heart of tort law. Today, its scholarly defenders fall into two major camps. Pragmatic constructivists such as Dean John Goldberg and Professor Benjamin Zipursky believe that each tort — negligence, battery, defamation, and so on — defines a sort of relational legal wrong, which in turn encodes (though not precisely) a certain sort of relational moral wrong.68 Pragmatic constructivists tend to maintain a sort of studious philosophical quietism about the nature and content of these relational moral wrongs.69 Their focus is instead on elucidating the norms and practices of the courts and the legal profession, through which tort doctrine draws upon and roughly encodes relational moral wrongs recognized in ordinary moral life.70。关于这个话题，手游提供了深入分析
Re-organized and extended documentation