This does not mean confusables.txt is wrong. It means confusables.txt is a visual-similarity claim that has never been empirically validated at scale. Many entries map characters to the same abstract target under NFKC decomposition (mathematical bold A to A, for instance), and the mapping is semantically correct even if the glyphs look nothing alike. But if you treat every confusables.txt entry as equally dangerous for UI security, you are generating massive false positive rates for 96.5% of the dataset.
8点1氪丨玛莎拉蒂母公司全年净亏损1800亿元人民币；男童发育不良新药引爆股价，长春高新回应；德国总理默茨参访宇树科技
。关于这个话题，Line官方版本下载提供了深入分析
Opus 4.5 used its Web Search tool to confirm the issue is expected with fontdue and implemented ab_glyph instead which did fix the curves.
This story was originally featured on Fortune.com